

Today in class we looked at two university magazine front covers and analysed them. We looked at their colour scheme, editing, use of image, use of word, placement of items and the overall look of the cover. Myself and the rest of the class were not impressed with either magazine and found more criticism than appraisal for both magazine covers.
Both magazines had a very different approach. Newman magazine put forward a very childlike outlook for their cover, using images of young children, childrens toys and even included a story on the effects of video games on young people. I did not like this approach. I found that the message of the magazine and its audience greatly contrasted. The magazine cover confused me as I found that a lot of the images used were extremely irrelevent or unexplained. An image of a money box in the sky was used which entirely contridicted our stereotypical view of a mature, sensible university magazine. However, the magazine did include some positives as it reflected an understanding of editing. You could see that the producer of this cover was well aware of how to edit images and text. I also thought that the masthead stood out well and this benefitted the magazine cover positively. The coverlines used were also a good method of persuading the audience as they were detailed and there was quite a few shown. However they did fade into the background with their dark colouring, which although it was consistent with the rest of the magazine, did still not grab the attention of a potential buyer. The entire front cover used a very dull and dark colour scheme which did not live up to its childlike content.
The QUAD magazine cover, for me was an improvement on the previous. I found it to look more proffessional with its colour scheming and its more fitting use of images. However I was not impressed with this cover as I felt the lack of editing was its downfall. The cover resembled a group of pictures more than it did a magazine cover. Though some images were more suitable for the audience of this magazine, others were just as confusing. The images needed to be explained with captions. I was disappointed that there was not one main image to this magazine cover and this made it hard to distinguish the genre of the magazine. Instead, a group of images were placed on the cover in blocks. This made the cover look very square and it did not flow smoothly. I found the masthead to be very well presented and I thought that it contrasted well against the white background. However, this would have been a good place to use a logo, as this is a promotional method. However they did not do this and only used the logo once, at the bottom of the page.
In conclusion I found the QUAD magazine cover to be presented better and to fit its genre in a more suitable way. I think this is due to its ability to target its audience with a use of images and a look of proffessionalism. I found the Newman magazine to be to immature and the design was too messy to understand its concept, as sometimes, less is more.


